DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 FAW Bora vs 2008 Brilliance M2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Brilliance M2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeBrilliance
BoraModelM2
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
216 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
210 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4376 mmLength4648 mm
1735 mmWidth1800 mm
1446 mmHeight1450 mm
1380 KgWeight1480 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 FAW Bora and 2008 Brilliance M2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Brilliance M2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…