DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 FAW Bora vs 2008 Toyota Matrix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Matrix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeToyota
BoraModelMatrix
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h—
216 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
150 HPPower124 HP
210 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4376 mmLength4350 mm
1735 mmWidth1775 mm
1446 mmHeight1540 mm
1380 KgWeight1215 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 FAW Bora and 2008 Toyota Matrix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Matrix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…