2004 • FAW
Bora
FAW Bora 1.8i 20V T (150 Hp) 2004Overall Score62.5/100
2004 FAW Bora vs 2004 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.8 (134 Hp) 2004Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
FAW BoraSpecificationKia Optima
FAWMakeKia
BoraModelOptima
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
FAW BoraSpecificationKia Optima
10,5 s0–100 km/h—
216 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1836 cc
150 HPPower134 HP
210 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
FAW BoraSpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
FAW BoraSpecificationKia Optima
4376 mmLength4745 mm
1735 mmWidth1815 mm
1446 mmHeight1420 mm
1380 KgWeight1390 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 FAW Bora and 2004 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableToyota Opa vs FAW Bora2004 and 2004 model yearsVSImage unavailableKia Optima vs FAW Bora2004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableRenault Samsung SM5 vs FAW Bora2004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Sentra vs FAW Bora2004 and 2004 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Tiida vs FAW Bora2004 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…