DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 FAW Bora vs 2010 Seat Exeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Exeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW BoraSpecificationSeat Exeo
FAWMakeSeat
BoraModelExeo
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

FAW BoraSpecificationSeat Exeo
11,1 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
206 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
170 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

FAW BoraSpecificationSeat Exeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW BoraSpecificationSeat Exeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

FAW BoraSpecificationSeat Exeo
4376 mmLength4666 mm
1735 mmWidth1772 mm
1446 mmHeight1454 mm
1310 KgWeight1545 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2642 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 FAW Bora and 2010 Seat Exeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Exeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…