DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 FAW Besturn X80 vs 2016 Volkswagen Multivan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeVolkswagen
Besturn X80ModelMultivan
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,2 s
185 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
147 HPPower150 HP
184 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17; 235/55 R17; 255/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4586 mmLength4904 mm
1820 mmWidth1904 mm
1695 mmHeight1970 mm
1500 KgWeight2169 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 FAW Besturn X80 and 2016 Volkswagen Multivan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…