2010 • FAW
Besturn
FAW Besturn 2.3 Automatic (163 Hp) 2010Overall Score51.25/100
2010 FAW Besturn vs 2015 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 Duratorq TDCi (115 Hp) 2015Overall Score51/100
WINNER
FAW Besturn
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
FAW BesturnSpecificationFord C-Max
FAWMakeFord
BesturnModelC-Max
2010Model year2015
—Body typeMPV
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
FAW BesturnSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
163 HPPower115 HP
0 NmTorque270 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
FAW BesturnSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 FAW Besturn and 2015 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, FAW Besturn leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Image unavailableVSImage unavailableSsangYong Actyon vs FAW Besturn2010 and 2010 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableDaihatsu Be-go vs FAW Besturn2010 and 2010 model years
VSImage unavailableSuzuki Forenza vs FAW Besturn2006 and 2010 model yearsVSImage unavailableFord C-Max vs FAW Besturn2015 and 2010 model years
VSImage unavailableSuzuki Forenza vs FAW Besturn2006 and 2010 model yearsVSImage unavailableFord C-Max vs FAW Besturn2015 and 2010 model yearsComments are loading…