DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 FAW Besturn B70 vs 2016 Renault Captur Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn B70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeRenault
Besturn B70ModelCaptur
2014Model year2016
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
147 HPPower143 HP
184 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4729 mmLength4333 mm
1782 mmWidth1813 mm
1465 mmHeight1613 mm
1405 KgWeight1390-1411 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2673 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 FAW Besturn B70 and 2016 Renault Captur approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn B70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…