DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 FAW Besturn B70 vs 2014 Mini Paceman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Paceman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeMini
Besturn B70ModelPaceman
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
200 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
147 HPPower112 HP
184 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4729 mmLength4109 mm
1782 mmWidth1786 mm
1465 mmHeight1518 mm
1405 KgWeight1405 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 FAW Besturn B70 and 2014 Mini Paceman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Paceman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…