DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 FAW Besturn B70 vs 2012 Mazda 5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeMazda
Besturn B70Model5
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
147 HPPower150 HP
0 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4705 mmLength4585 mm
1782 mmWidth1750 mm
1465 mmHeight1615 mm
1405 KgWeight1410 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 FAW Besturn B70 and 2012 Mazda 5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…