DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 FAW Besturn B50 vs 2012 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn B50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeMini
Besturn B50ModelConvertible
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
190 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
103 HPPower98 HP
145 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank40 lt
11 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4600 mmLength3723 mm
1785 mmWidth1683 mm
1435 mmHeight1414 mm
1285 KgWeight1160 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 FAW Besturn B50 and 2012 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn B50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…