DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 FAW Besturn B50 vs 2014 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn B50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

60–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeFord
Besturn B50ModelC-Max
2016Model year2014
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
136 HPPower163 HP
220 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4380 mm
1795 mmWidth1828 mm
1460 mmHeight1626 mm
1432 KgWeight1488 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 FAW Besturn B50 and 2014 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn B50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…