DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 FAW Audi 100 vs 1996 Honda Shuttle Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeHonda
Audi 100ModelShuttle
1996Model year1996
SedanBody type—
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement2155 cc
130 HPPower150 HP
188 NmTorque198 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
185/70 R14 HTyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4792 mmLength—
1814 mmWidth—
1446 mmHeight—
1250 KgWeight—
2687 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 FAW Audi 100 and 1996 Honda Shuttle approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…