2009 • FAW
Admiral
FAW Admiral 2.2 (103 Hp) 2009Overall Score48.25/100
2009 FAW Admiral vs 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mitsubishi
Outlander
Mitsubishi Outlander 2.0 MIVEC (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score49/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Outlander
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48.25–49
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
FAW AdmiralSpecificationMitsubishi Outlander
FAWMakeMitsubishi
AdmiralModelOutlander
2009Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
FAW AdmiralSpecificationMitsubishi Outlander
—0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
103 HPPower150 HP
0 NmTorque195 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
FAW AdmiralSpecificationMitsubishi Outlander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
FAW AdmiralSpecificationMitsubishi Outlander
—Length4665 mm
—Width1800 mm
—Height1680 mm
—Weight1380 Kg
—Wheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 FAW Admiral and 2012 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableHyundai Getz vs FAW Admiral2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableFiat Albea vs FAW Admiral2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableFord C-Max vs FAW Admiral2010 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Kuga vs FAW Admiral2010 and 2009 model yearsVSImage unavailableMitsubishi Outlander vs FAW Admiral2012 and 2009 model yearsComments are loading…