2009 • FAW
Admiral
FAW Admiral 2.2 (103 Hp) 2009Overall Score48.25/100
2009 FAW Admiral vs 2009 Hyundai Getz Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Hyundai
Getz
Hyundai Getz 1.5 CRDi HP (110 Hp) 2009Overall Score49/100
WINNER
Hyundai Getz
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48.25–49
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
FAW AdmiralSpecificationHyundai Getz
FAWMakeHyundai
AdmiralModelGetz
2009Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3/5
Performance
FAW AdmiralSpecificationHyundai Getz
—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
103 HPPower110 HP
0 NmTorque260 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
FAW AdmiralSpecificationHyundai Getz
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
FAW AdmiralSpecificationHyundai Getz
—Length3825 mm
—Width1665 mm
—Height1490 mm
—Weight1187 Kg
—Wheelbase2455 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 FAW Admiral and 2009 Hyundai Getz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Getz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableHyundai Getz vs FAW Admiral2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableFiat Albea vs FAW Admiral2009 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableFord C-Max vs FAW Admiral2010 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Kuga vs FAW Admiral2010 and 2009 model years
VSImage unavailableMitsubishi Outlander vs FAW Admiral2012 and 2009 model yearsComments are loading…