DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 FAW A6 vs 1997 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW A6SpecificationFord Taurus
FAWMakeFord
A6ModelTaurus
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

FAW A6SpecificationFord Taurus
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
226 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
193 HPPower147 HP
280 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

FAW A6SpecificationFord Taurus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

FAW A6SpecificationFord Taurus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15 VTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

FAW A6SpecificationFord Taurus
4886 mmLength5070 mm
1810 mmWidth1854 mm
1475 mmHeight1463 mm
1560 KgWeight1579 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 FAW A6 and 1997 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…