DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 FAW A6 vs 2001 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW A6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAW A6SpecificationMG ZS
FAWMakeMG
A6ModelZS
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

FAW A6SpecificationMG ZS
12,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
198 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
125 HPPower117 HP
168 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

FAW A6SpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

FAW A6SpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

FAW A6SpecificationMG ZS
4886 mmLength4520 mm
1810 mmWidth1700 mm
1475 mmHeight1390 mm
1440 KgWeight1125 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 FAW A6 and 2001 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW A6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…