DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Eagle Vision vs 1996 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

EagleMakeFord
VisionModelExplorer
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
218 HPPower160 HP
300 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank66 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/60 R16 VTyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5120 mmLength4536 mm
1890 mmWidth1783 mm
1417 mmHeight1714 mm
1582 KgWeight1807 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Eagle Vision and 1996 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…