DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 DS 3 vs 2016 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DS 3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
DSMakeKTM
3ModelX-Bow
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeRoadster
4Seats2
3Doors—

Performance

DS 3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
6,5 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
230 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
208 HPPower240 HP
300 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DS 3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

DS 3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/40 R18Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

DS 3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
3968 mmLength3738 mm
—Width1915 mm
1443 mmHeight1202 mm
1091 KgWeight790 Kg
2464 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 DS 3 and 2016 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…