DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Dodge RAM vs 2004 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Dodge RAMSpecificationMG ZT
DodgeMakeMG
RAMModelZT
2009Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeSedan
6Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

Dodge RAMSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
238 HPPower260 HP
400 NmTorque410 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Dodge RAMSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption17,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,4 lt
—Average consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Dodge RAMSpecificationMG ZT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
265/70 R17; 245/70 R17Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Dodge RAMSpecificationMG ZT
5834 mmLength4740 mm
2019 mmWidth1780 mm
1880 mmHeight1430 mm
—Weight1595 Kg
3569 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Dodge RAM and 2004 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…