DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Dodge Monaco vs 1992 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeNissan
MonacoModelCedric
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

195 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2975 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
152 HPPower200 HP
232 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank80 lt
15 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/70 R14Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4900 mmLength4780 mm
1780 mmWidth1745 mm
1390 mmHeight1410 mm
1355 KgWeight1610 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Dodge Monaco and 1992 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…