DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Dodge Durango vs 2000 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Durango

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeFord
DurangoModelMustang
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
8Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
180 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
238 HPPower263 HP
400 NmTorque302 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank59 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
13,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4910 mmLength4653 mm
1810 mmWidth1857 mm
1804 mmHeight1350 mm
2135 KgWeight1550 Kg
2944 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Dodge Durango and 2000 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Durango leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…