DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Dodge Durango vs 1999 Ford Crown Victoria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Durango

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeFord
DurangoModelCrown Victoria
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
8Seats6
5Doors4

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
238 HPPower213 HP
400 NmTorque366 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank75 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption18 lt
13,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4910 mmLength5397 mm
1810 mmWidth1976 mm
1804 mmHeight1440 mm
2135 KgWeight1720 Kg
2944 mmWheelbase2905 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Dodge Durango and 1999 Ford Crown Victoria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Durango leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…