DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Dodge Dakota vs 2002 Dodge Durango Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Durango

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

86.75–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeDodge
DakotaModelDurango
2005Model year2002
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
5895 ccEngine displacement5895 cc
250 HPPower250 HP
454 NmTorque454 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
91 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption23,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption16,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
—Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5463 mmLength4910 mm
1818 mmWidth1810 mm
1699 mmHeight1804 mm
—Weight2190 Kg
3227 mmWheelbase2944 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Dodge Dakota and 2002 Dodge Durango approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Durango leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…