2005 • Dodge
Dakota
Dodge Dakota 4.7 V8 (238 Hp) 2005Overall Score81.75/100
2005 Dodge Dakota vs 2004 MG ZT Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • MG
ZT
MG ZT 4.6 i V8 32V (260 Hp) 2004Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
MG ZT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Dodge DakotaSpecificationMG ZT
DodgeMakeMG
DakotaModelZT
2005Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeSedan
6Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Dodge DakotaSpecificationMG ZT
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
238 HPPower260 HP
400 NmTorque410 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Dodge DakotaSpecificationMG ZT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
91 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption17,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,4 lt
—Average consumption13,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dodge DakotaSpecificationMG ZT
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Dodge DakotaSpecificationMG ZT
5463 mmLength4740 mm
1818 mmWidth1780 mm
1699 mmHeight1430 mm
—Weight1595 Kg
3227 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Dodge Dakota and 2004 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSJeep Grand Cherokee vs Dodge Dakota2005 and 2005 model years
VSDodge Durango vs Dodge Dakota2004 and 2005 model yearsImage unavailableVSGMC Yukon vs Dodge Dakota2005 and 2005 model yearsImage unavailableVSMG ZT vs Dodge Dakota2004 and 2005 model yearsImage unavailableVSCadillac DE Ville vs Dodge Dakota2004 and 2005 model yearsComments are loading…