DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Dodge Dakota vs 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dodge Dakota

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeFord
DakotaModelCrown Victoria
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
6Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
238 HPPower238 HP
400 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
91 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5463 mmLength5385 mm
1818 mmWidth1986 mm
1699 mmHeight1443 mm
—Weight1855 Kg
3227 mmWheelbase2913 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Dodge Dakota and 2000 Ford Crown Victoria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dodge Dakota leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…