DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Acura Integra vs 2015 Artega Scalo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Artega Scalo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4.75 points.

62.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeArtega
IntegraModelScalo
2001Model year2015
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h3,6 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement0 cc
170 HPPower0 HP
174 NmTorque780 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeElectric
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears1 Automatic
195/55 R15Tyre size235/35 R19 ZR; 285/30 R19 ZR

Dimensions

4380 mmLength4010 mm
1710 mmWidth1880 mm
1338 mmHeight1200 mm
1235 KgWeight1585 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Acura Integra and 2015 Artega Scalo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Artega Scalo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…