DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Dodge Charger vs 2008 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeFord
ChargerModelRanger
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
181 HPPower156 HP
258 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption—
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R17Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5082 mmLength5075 mm
1891 mmWidth1805 mm
1479 mmHeight1745 mm
1695 KgWeight1802 Kg
3048 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Dodge Charger and 2008 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…