DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Dodge Caravan vs 2000 Toyota Tundra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Tundra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeToyota
CaravanModelTundra
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typePick-up
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3301 ccEngine displacement3378 cc
182 HPPower190 HP
285 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank100 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption15,6 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption13,0 lt
—Average consumption14,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R15; 215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size245/70 R16; 265/70 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

5093 mmLength5525 mm
1995 mmWidth1910 mm
1750 mmHeight1825-1835 mm
1885 KgWeight1854 Kg
3030 mmWheelbase3260 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Dodge Caravan and 2000 Toyota Tundra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Tundra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…