DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Acura Integra vs 2000 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeSubaru
IntegraModelForester
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCrossover
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,4 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1797 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
174 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4380 mmLength4460 mm
1710 mmWidth1735 mm
1338 mmHeight1580 mm
1235 KgWeight1445 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Acura Integra and 2000 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…