DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Dodge Caravan vs 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

66.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeMitsubishi
CaravanModelChallenger
1995Model year1996
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2835 cc
144 HPPower140 HP
234 NmTorque314 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/70 R15Tyre size265/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4897 mmLength4530 mm
1829 mmWidth1775 mm
1685 mmHeight1730 mm
1619 KgWeight1850 Kg
3030 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Dodge Caravan and 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…