DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Dodge Caravan vs 2002 Ford Contour Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeFord
CaravanModelContour
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2429 ccEngine displacement2539 cc
152 HPPower170 HP
226 NmTorque224 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65R16Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABS—

Dimensions

4803 mmLength4671 mm
1996 mmWidth1755 mm
1750 mmHeight1384 mm
1820 KgWeight1257 Kg
2878 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Dodge Caravan and 2002 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…