DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1981 De Lorean Dmc-12 vs 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

De LoreanMakeOldsmobile
Dmc-12ModelCutlass
1981Model year1981
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h—
209 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2849 ccEngine displacement2471 cc
132 HPPower106 HP
225 NmTorque183 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
195/60 R14; 235/60 R15Tyre size185/75 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4267 mmLength4835 mm
1989 mmWidth1765 mm
1140 mmHeight1375 mm
1233 KgWeight1275 Kg
2408 mmWheelbase2665 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1981 De Lorean Dmc-12 and 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…