DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 David Brown Mini Remastered vs 2017 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

David BrownMakeAlfa Romeo
Mini RemasteredModelMiTo
2017Model year2017
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats4/5
2Doors3

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
145 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1330 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
83 HPPower78 HP
133 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3050 mmLength4063 mm
1470 mmWidth1720 mm
1330 mmHeight1446 mm
740 KgWeight1080 Kg
2040 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 David Brown Mini Remastered and 2017 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…