2000 • Daihatsu
Pyzar
Daihatsu Pyzar 1.6 i (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Daihatsu Pyzar vs 2000 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.8 GT (182.AC) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Bravo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationFiat Bravo
DaihatsuMakeFiat
PyzarModelBravo
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationFiat Bravo
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
115 HPPower113 HP
140 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daihatsu PyzarSpecificationFiat Bravo
4050 mmLength4025 mm
1640 mmWidth1755 mm
1620 mmHeight1420 mm
1080 KgWeight1100 Kg
2395 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daihatsu Pyzar and 2000 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…