DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Daihatsu Charade vs 1999 Toyota Funcargo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daihatsu Charade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaihatsuMakeToyota
CharadeModelFuncargo
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
170 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1296 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
84 HPPower86 HP
105 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/80 R13 STyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength3890 mm
1620 mmWidth1690 mm
1390 mmHeight1680 mm
830 KgWeight1055 Kg
2395 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Daihatsu Charade and 1999 Toyota Funcargo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daihatsu Charade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…