DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Daewoo Tico vs 1986 Fiat 127 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat 127

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

39.5–40.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 127
DaewooMakeFiat
TicoModel127
2002Model year1986
HatchbackBody type—
4Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 127
17,0 s0–100 km/h—
143 km/hTop speed0 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement0 cc
48 HPPower50 HP
64 NmTorque0 Nm
3Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 127
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 127
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
135 R12Tyre size—

Dimensions

Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 127
3340 mmLength—
1400 mmWidth—
1395 mmHeight—
640 KgWeight—
2335 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Daewoo Tico and 1986 Fiat 127 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat 127 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…