2002 • Daewoo
Tico
Daewoo Tico 0.8 (48 Hp) 2002Overall Score39.5/100
2002 Daewoo Tico vs 1996 Fiat 126 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Fiat
126
Fiat 126 1996Overall Score36.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Tico
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.
39.5–36.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 126
DaewooMakeFiat
TicoModel126
2002Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 126
17,0 s0–100 km/h33,0 s
143 km/hTop speed116 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement704 cc
48 HPPower26 HP
64 NmTorque49 Nm
3Cylinders2
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 126
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank21 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 126
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
135 R12Tyre size135/70 R13
Dimensions
Daewoo TicoSpecificationFiat 126
3340 mmLength3105 mm
1400 mmWidth1375 mm
1395 mmHeight1345 mm
640 KgWeight645 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Daewoo Tico and 1996 Fiat 126 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Tico leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…