DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Daewoo Tico vs 1999 Daewoo Tico Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Tico

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeDaewoo
TicoModelTico
2002Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
143 km/hTop speed143 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement796 cc
48 HPPower48 HP
64 NmTorque64 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank30 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
135 R12Tyre size135 R12

Dimensions

3340 mmLength3340 mm
1400 mmWidth1400 mm
1395 mmHeight1395 mm
640 KgWeight640 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Daewoo Tico and 1999 Daewoo Tico approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Tico leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…