2002 • Daewoo
Tico
Daewoo Tico 0.8 (48 Hp) 2002Overall Score39.5/100
2002 Daewoo Tico vs 2005 Daewoo Damas Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Daewoo
Damas
Daewoo Damas 0.8 (38 Hp) 2005Overall Score40.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Damas
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo TicoSpecificationDaewoo Damas
DaewooMakeDaewoo
TicoModelDamas
2002Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Daewoo TicoSpecificationDaewoo Damas
17,0 s0–100 km/h24,5 s
143 km/hTop speed0 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement796 cc
48 HPPower38 HP
64 NmTorque64 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo TicoSpecificationDaewoo Damas
PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank37 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo TicoSpecificationDaewoo Damas
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
135 R12Tyre size—
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo TicoSpecificationDaewoo Damas
3340 mmLength3230 mm
1400 mmWidth1400 mm
1395 mmHeight1920 mm
640 KgWeight—
2335 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Daewoo Tico and 2005 Daewoo Damas approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Damas leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…