2008 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 2.0 i (128 Hp) 2008Overall Score53.5/100
2008 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2012 Great Wall Steed Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Great Wall
Steed
Great Wall Steed 2.4i (136 Hp) 2012Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Great Wall Steed
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
DaewooMakeGreat Wall
RezzoModelSteed
2008Model year2012
MinivanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
12,4 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
104 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
128 HPPower136 HP
176 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,8 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationGreat Wall Steed
4350 mmLength5040 mm
1750 mmWidth1800 mm
1580 mmHeight1730 mm
1392 KgWeight—
2600 mmWheelbase3050 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Daewoo Rezzo and 2012 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall Steed leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…