DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2003 Skoda Fabia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeSkoda
RezzoModelFabia
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
105 HPPower98 HP
169 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength3960 mm
1755 mmWidth1645 mm
1580 mmHeight1450 mm
1260 KgWeight1155 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Daewoo Rezzo and 2003 Skoda Fabia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…