DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2003 Peugeot 206 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakePeugeot
RezzoModel206
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
105 HPPower90 HP
169 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption6,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength3835 mm
1755 mmWidth1652 mm
1580 mmHeight1432 mm
1260 KgWeight1070 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2442 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Daewoo Rezzo and 2003 Peugeot 206 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…