2002 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 2.0 i (105 Hp) 2002Overall Score54.25/100
2002 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2002 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 DI (90 Hp) 2002Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Rezzo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
DaewooMakeFord
RezzoModelMondeo
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
10,5 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
105 HPPower90 HP
169 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Mondeo
4350 mmLength4731 mm
1755 mmWidth1812 mm
1580 mmHeight1429 mm
1260 KgWeight1492 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2754 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Daewoo Rezzo and 2002 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…