DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2004 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeFord
RezzoModelMondeo
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower115 HP
184 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
12 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4731 mm
1750 mmWidth1812 mm
1580 mmHeight1429 mm
1270 KgWeight1498 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Daewoo Rezzo and 2004 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…