DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2003 Opel Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeOpel
RezzoModelFrontera
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
200 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
184 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
12 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
—Average consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4268 mm
1750 mmWidth1787 mm
1580 mmHeight1692 mm
1270 KgWeight1660 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Daewoo Rezzo and 2003 Opel Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…