2003 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 2.0 16V (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2003 Nissan X-Trail Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Nissan
X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail 2.2 dCi (114 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Nissan X-Trail
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationNissan X-Trail
DaewooMakeNissan
RezzoModelX-Trail
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationNissan X-Trail
13,4 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
200 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
136 HPPower114 HP
184 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationNissan X-Trail
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationNissan X-Trail
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
195/60 R15Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationNissan X-Trail
4350 mmLength4510 mm
1750 mmWidth1765 mm
1580 mmHeight1675 mm
1270 KgWeight1534 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2625 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Daewoo Rezzo and 2003 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…