2003 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 2.0 16V (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2003 Honda CR-V Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Honda
CR-V
Honda CR-V 2.0 16V (150 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Honda CR-V
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationHonda CR-V
DaewooMakeHonda
RezzoModelCR-V
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationHonda CR-V
13,4 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
200 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
184 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationHonda CR-V
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
12 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationHonda CR-V
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationHonda CR-V
4350 mmLength4555 mm
1750 mmWidth1780 mm
1580 mmHeight1710 mm
1270 KgWeight1485 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Daewoo Rezzo and 2003 Honda CR-V approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Honda CR-V leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…