2000 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 2.0 16V (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.0 i 16V ZX3 (131 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Focus
DaewooMakeFord
RezzoModelFocus
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Focus
13,4 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
136 HPPower131 HP
184 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo RezzoSpecificationFord Focus
4350 mmLength4270 mm
1750 mmWidth1699 mm
1580 mmHeight1430 mm
1270 KgWeight1200 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2616 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daewoo Rezzo and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…