2001 • Daewoo
Musso
Daewoo Musso 3.2 24V (220 Hp) 2001Overall Score65.5/100
2001 Daewoo Musso vs 2002 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 3.2 (243 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Daewoo Musso
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo MussoSpecificationVolvo XC90
DaewooMakeVolvo
MussoModelXC90
2001Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Daewoo MussoSpecificationVolvo XC90
10,2 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3199 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
220 HPPower243 HP
307 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo MussoSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,9 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Daewoo MussoSpecificationVolvo XC90
4640 mmLength4807 mm
1864 mmWidth1936 mm
1735 mmHeight1784 mm
1935 KgWeight2218 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2857 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Daewoo Musso and 2002 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSHolden Frontera vs Daewoo Musso2001 and 2001 model years
VSFord Escape vs Daewoo Musso2001 and 2001 model yearsImage unavailableVSLexus RX vs Daewoo Musso2001 and 2001 model years
VSDodge Caravan vs Daewoo Musso2001 and 2001 model yearsImage unavailableVSVolvo XC90 vs Daewoo Musso2002 and 2001 model yearsComments are loading…