DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Daewoo Musso vs 1997 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeChrysler
MussoModelConcorde
1995Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
190 km/hTop speed187 km/h
3199 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
220 HPPower203 HP
307 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
16,9 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/70 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength5310 mm
1864 mmWidth1900 mm
1735 mmHeight1420 mm
1935 KgWeight1570 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Daewoo Musso and 1997 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…